T+1 implementation guide for European markets: report
A practical guide to planning and managing T+1 implementation across European markets.
In Partnership with

Accelerated settlement in Europe will depend on more than budget and intent. This guide examines how firms are preparing for T+1, where operating model fragmentation and infrastructure constraints remain most acute, and what questions firms should address across planning, build and execution.
Tier one automation gains
Automation
The 2024 transitions provided a clear view of how firms approached settlement acceleration — and where automation investment made the greatest difference.
The automation gains made during preparation are now providing a foundation for the next wave of global T+1 transitions.
Key success driver
Operations
Automating allocations and confirmations was the single most important operational factor — not technology investment in general, but this specific capability.
Firms that had already invested in this area before the deadline experienced materially smoother transitions.
Post-go-live work
Optimisation
The transition did not end at go-live — nearly half of firms continued refining processes and operating models well after the deadline passed.
Post-go-live optimisation reflects the depth of change T+1 requires across the full operating model.
T+1 preparation in Europe is moving from high-level planning into more detailed implementation decisions. The central challenge is not simply whether firms are investing, but whether their operating models, infrastructure and trade-cycle workflows are ready to support accelerated settlement at scale.
What questions should firms be asking as they prepare for T+1 in Europe? Where are the main execution risks emerging across structure, scalability and trade-cycle design?
The report draws on industry benchmarking results and interviews with leading experts to provide a practical framework for firms preparing for accelerated settlement. It is structured around foundational questions, regional considerations and trade-cycle pressure points across execution, confirmation, funding and settlement.
The research, developed in collaboration with Citi, the UK T+1 Accelerated Settlement Taskforce and the European Union (EU) T+1 Industry Committee, highlights:
31% report budget growth: some firms are increasing investment operations budgets, but funding alone is not resolving execution challenges
32% still process trades locally: localised processing models remain common, increasing operational fragmentation
29% do not operate a global model: many European firms still lack the model consistency needed for more compressed settlement cycles
25% believe current infrastructure may not scale effectively into T+1
40% identify securities lending as a risk: securities lending platforms are seen as a key scalability constraint in the transition
Keep reading — it's free
Verify your email to read this content
Ask the Xchange AI
Have a question about our research? Ask our AI assistant for specific insights.
SHARE THIS INSIGHT

Discover More
View All InsightsReport
12 October 2026
Explore how the tokenised equities market is developing and the opportunities shaping wider adoption.
Podcast
8 October 2026
What surprised us at Sibos? The post-trade triangle of T+1, 23x5 and tokensiation, making up the majority of work in the industry
Xchange brief
8 October 2026
Two deadlines, different scopes: how to understand cash and repo clearing, test your transactions, plan changes your business needs?
Webinar
7 October 2026
Join BNY, Broadridge, DTCC and SIFMA to explore what remains ahead as the U.S. Treasury central clearing deadlines approach.

Report
6 October 2026
See how T+1 preparation practically differs across segments as Europe enters the final year before the 2027 transition.
