US Treasury central clearing (pulse survey): key findings

How prepared are firms for mandatory clearing of US Treasury securities?

In Partnership with

Content Types

Key findings

Topics

Clearing and collateral

Region

North America

SHARE THIS INSIGHT

Mandatory US Treasury central clearing is approaching, but readiness remains uneven across regions and firm types. These key findings show where confidence is high, where project progress is lagging, and why margin, capital and operational change are the main pressure points.

Capital costs rising

Cost

More than a third anticipate margin increases well above the current level, while very few expect any reduction.

US Treasury central clearing is expected to have a materially negative impact on both operating and treasury costs.

Buy side still researching

Readiness

A ring graphic showing 77% of buy-side firms still in research mode.

Time is the main constraint – nearly one in three firms do not expect implementation to finish until end-2027.

Client contract repapering and back-office system changes remain ahead of most firms still in the research phase.

Back office main concern

Operations

A graphic showing 71% cite back-office systems and contracts as the main concern.

For the buy side, the impact is concentrated at the repo desk – for the sell side, it extends across the organisation.

Firms that move earlier will have more time to refine their operating model before go-live.

Mandatory clearing is approaching, but market readiness is far from uniform. Confidence may be relatively high on the surface, yet many firms are still early in planning while the operational and cost impact is becoming clearer.

How prepared is the market really for mandatory US Treasury central clearing? Which firms are moving ahead with implementation, and where do knowledge gaps, system changes and contract reform still threaten delivery timelines?

The findings are based on industry input examining how firms across regions and segments are preparing for mandatory clearing, including expected cost impacts, operational change requirements and implementation progress.

The research, produced in collaboration with Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), BNY Mellon, Broadridge and Depository Trust Company (DTC), highlights:

88% of firms say they are at least somewhat confident of being ready ahead of the deadline. Only 47% describe themselves as very confident

77% of buy-side firms in research mode: most buy-side firms have yet to move beyond researching US Treasury central clearing

55% expect higher capital costs: more than half of respondents expect regulatory capital costs to rise. 38% anticipate margin increases of more than 25%

Low familiarity outside North America: awareness remains much lower in overseas markets. Only 27% of European respondents say they are very familiar with the rule changes; Asia-Pacific (APAC) firms report only partial familiarity

71% cite contracts and back office as key concerns: client contract repapering and back-office system changes are seen as the biggest operational challenges

Keep reading — it's free

Verify your email to read this content